Technical Architecture | Heritage
Technical Architecture | Heritage
Euritmia structures its work in clearly defined phases to ensure informed decision-making, transparency, and traceability.
Each phase corresponds to a specific deliverable, with a clear structure and identified supporting evidence.
Objective
To confirm that sufficient information is available to start the assessment without the risk of incorrect or misleading conclusions.
What you receive
An objective list of confirmed information
Clear identification of missing information
A structured request for any missing data, with priorities indicated (where applicable)
Quality principle
Where essential data is missing, Euritmia does not issue conclusions.
The outcome is recorded as “Inconclusive due to missing data”, clearly identifying what is required to proceed.
Objective
To provide an initial technical assessment and a risk overview, based on the information available.
What you receive (Technical Screening PDF)
Executive summary oriented to decision-making
Data reviewed and level of completeness (information used and identified gaps)
Risk overview by topic (traffic-light system):
Planning and land use
Heritage (where applicable)
Environmental constraints (where applicable)
Planning and consents pathway risk
Time and cost uncertainty
Key constraints and typical critical issues
Recommended next steps
Appendices (where applicable)
Plans and extracts with the site location clearly marked
Supporting evidence and references cited in the report
Objective
To define, on a documented and technical basis, the scope of likely acceptability and limits of intervention, identifying risks and providing guidance for project development and the associated administrative process.
What you receive (Full Preliminary Assessment Report — PDF)
Executive summary (decision)
conclusion: Likely acceptable / Conditional / Unlikely acceptable / Inconclusive
key reasons and practical implications
Scope, assumptions and limitations
what has been assessed, on what basis, and what falls outside the scope
Information base
list of documents and data considered
identification of relevant gaps
Planning policy and regulatory framework
applicable instruments and statutory regimes
concise explanation of constraints affecting the proposal
Heritage and technical compatibility (where applicable)
interpretation of heritage constraints
likely acceptable limits of intervention
Conditions and likely acceptable limits of intervention
what is likely acceptable
what is conditional
what is not acceptable
Technical and administrative risks
critical issues
likely impact on time, cost and uncertainty
Guidance for the next stage
practical recommendations
indication of additional studies where required
Appendices (evidence and traceability)
Cartographic evidence (plans with marked location)
Relevant cited extracts
Supporting correspondence or statements (where available)
Record of applied criteria (where applicable)
This Preliminary Assessment supports informed decisions. It does not replace statutory consents, licences, or formal professional appointments.