Euritmia Deliverables

Euritmia structures its work in clearly defined phases to ensure informed decision-making, transparency, and traceability.
Each phase corresponds to a specific deliverable, with a clear structure and identified supporting evidence.

Phase 0 — Input Validation (Pre-analysis)

Objective
To confirm that sufficient information is available to start the assessment without the risk of incorrect or misleading conclusions.

What you receive

• An objective list of confirmed information

• Clear identification of missing information

• A structured request for any missing data, with priorities indicated (where applicable)

Quality principle
Where essential data is missing, Euritmia does not issue conclusions.
The outcome is recorded as “Inconclusive due to missing data”, clearly identifying what is required to proceed.

Phase 1 — Technical Screening

Objective
To provide an initial technical assessment and a risk overview, based on the information available.

What you receive (Technical Screening PDF)

• Executive summary oriented to decision-making

• Data reviewed and level of completeness (information used and identified gaps)

• Risk overview by topic (traffic-light system):

  • Planning and land use

  • Heritage (where applicable)

  • Environmental constraints (where applicable)

  • Planning and consents pathway risk

  • Time and cost uncertainty

• Key constraints and typical critical issues

• Recommended next steps

Appendices (where applicable)

• Plans and extracts with the site location clearly marked

• Supporting evidence and references cited in the report

Full Preliminary Assessment Report

Objective
To define, on a documented and technical basis, the scope of likely acceptability and limits of intervention, identifying risks and providing guidance for project development and the associated administrative process.

What you receive (Full Preliminary Assessment Report — PDF)

1. Executive summary (decision)

   • conclusion: Likely acceptable / Conditional / Unlikely acceptable / Inconclusive

   • key reasons and practical implications

2. Scope, assumptions and limitations

   • what has been assessed, on what basis, and what falls outside the scope

3. Information base 

   • list of documents and data considered

   • identification of relevant gaps

4. Planning policy and regulatory framework

   • applicable instruments and statutory regimes

   • concise explanation of constraints affecting the proposal

5. Heritage and technical compatibility (where applicable)

   • interpretation of heritage constraints

   • likely acceptable limits of intervention

6. Conditions and likely acceptable limits of intervention

   • what is likely acceptable

   • what is conditional

   • what is not acceptable

7. Technical and administrative risks

   • critical issues

   • likely impact on time, cost and uncertainty

8. Guidance for the next stage

   • practical recommendations

   • indication of additional studies where required

Appendices (evidence and traceability)

• Cartographic evidence (plans with marked location)

• Relevant cited extracts

• Supporting correspondence or statements (where available)

• Record of applied criteria (where applicable)